Archive for the 'theory' Category

A terrible new AZ Court ruling for State, County, and Municipal employees who have been injured

Posted by Erik on March 3rd, 2010 filed in theory, vexation of the spirit

The Arizona Supreme Court announced yesterday that it would not grant review to a Division Two Arizona Court of Appeals case, Ariz. Dep’t of Trans. v. Cox.
Jennifer and Richard Cox were injured in a motor vehicle accident and incurred medical expenses of $25,000.00. They obtained a total of $30,000.00 from the motorist who hit [...]

Read More..>>

Stop sign behavior — motorists v. bicyclists

Posted by Erik on January 7th, 2010 filed in safety, theory

Video found at Bob Mionske’s Road Rights column.
Any article in the local paper about bicyclists will be sure to attract many on-line comments about scofflaw cyclists who never stop at stop signs. And it’s been debated in this website, too, with several of my readers wondering why cyclists don’t always come to a complete [...]

Read More..>>

Study finds bad driving, not bad cycling, the cause of most cycling accidents

Posted by Erik on December 29th, 2009 filed in Carhead, Preapocalyptic technological dystopia, opportunity knocks, safety, theory

This is interesting:
A tiny proportion of accidents involving cyclists are caused by riders jumping red lights or stop signs, or failing to wear high-visibility clothing and use lights, a government-commissioned study has discovered.
. . .
The data, which was analysed by the Transport Research Laboratory (TRL), showed that more than a quarter of all [...]

Read More..>>

Biking in Japan, where the car is always at fault

Posted by Erik on November 23rd, 2009 filed in theory

This just in from my friend and TBL Japan Correspondent, Sarah Jane:
Bikes in Japan are boring (but practical). They come with weird names like “Grave”, “Zapper”, and even “Weener”. I haven’t gotten pictures of all of the weird names, but I am forming a collection. I dream of BICAS everyday and miss [...]

Read More..>>

Vehicularists v. facilitators in new L.A. bike infrastructure planning

Posted by Erik on November 2nd, 2009 filed in theory

From an otherwise quite good article in today’s L.A. Times, the facilitators get short shrift:
The city of Los Angeles is currently updating its own bicycle infrastructure plan. Even as it does so, cycling experts and enthusiasts can’t agree on how to make the roads more bicycle-safe. Some advocate for more dedicated infrastructure, such as bike [...]

Read More..>>

Slate Magazine on “vehicularists” vs. “facilitators”

Posted by Erik on October 20th, 2009 filed in Preapocalyptic technological dystopia, theory

Thanks Red Star for pointing out this article in Slate today that outlines the two camps: those of us who want more bike-only infrastructure (“facilitators”), and those of us who want bikes to be recognized as legitimate vehicles on existing roads (“vehicularists”).
I tend to be more of a “use what you got” sort [...]

Read More..>>