<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study finds bad driving, not bad cycling, the cause of most cycling accidents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/study-finds-bad-driving-not-bad-cycling-the-cause-of-most-cycling-accidents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/study-finds-bad-driving-not-bad-cycling-the-cause-of-most-cycling-accidents/</link>
	<description>Because Every Bicyclist Needs a Good Lawyer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:06:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martha Retallick</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/study-finds-bad-driving-not-bad-cycling-the-cause-of-most-cycling-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-10741</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Retallick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/?p=1282#comment-10741</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another take on the same problem -- the drivers just aren&#039;t paying attention:

http://www.distraction.gov/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another take on the same problem &#8212; the drivers just aren&#8217;t paying attention:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.distraction.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://www.distraction.gov/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/study-finds-bad-driving-not-bad-cycling-the-cause-of-most-cycling-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-10626</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/?p=1282#comment-10626</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on lowering the drinking age. I think young adults in Europe are much more responsible drinkers because they do not perceive alcohol as a forbidden pleasure. That&#039;s a difficult argument to make in the US, though, especially in this age.

Thanks for sharing the study, it&#039;s confirmed what I&#039;ve long suspected and it&#039;s nice to have data to reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on lowering the drinking age. I think young adults in Europe are much more responsible drinkers because they do not perceive alcohol as a forbidden pleasure. That&#8217;s a difficult argument to make in the US, though, especially in this age.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing the study, it&#8217;s confirmed what I&#8217;ve long suspected and it&#8217;s nice to have data to reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BB</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/study-finds-bad-driving-not-bad-cycling-the-cause-of-most-cycling-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-10619</link>
		<dc:creator>BB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/?p=1282#comment-10619</guid>
		<description>Ed has a great page for collision studies in Arizona

http://azbikelaw.org/blog/understanding-collision-summaries/

I think Tom is citing Phoenix crash data. I saw 11 percent hit from behind in 2007 I do believe. 

Ed missed Scottsdale&#039;s crash data though. Which is buried in the master bike plan. 
64 percent of crashes were from sidewalk wrong riders. 
only 15 percent were in the roadway riding the right way. 
http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/traffic/alttransmethod/bikeways.asp
And if Scottsdale master plan can&#039;t get any better. The specifically address where the focus of enforcement should be. wrong way riders, failing to yield to pedestrians and I am guessing wrong way sidewalk riding, riding with out lights, and finally at the very very bottom obeying traffic signals. 

This is very true I have had many officers observe me safely rolling through stop signs. 


also almost 25 percent of our officers are trained to be bicycle cops. 

I agree with E. raise that dam driving age and lower the drinking age. Ban cell phone usage period. 
Lower the speed limits
Get EDRs into cars now not 2012. Start using the data in crashes which have EDRs in cars. 
Start revoking more DLs for longer periods of time. etc etc. This should be a no brainer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed has a great page for collision studies in Arizona</p>
<p><a href="http://azbikelaw.org/blog/understanding-collision-summaries/" rel="nofollow">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/understanding-collision-summaries/</a></p>
<p>I think Tom is citing Phoenix crash data. I saw 11 percent hit from behind in 2007 I do believe. </p>
<p>Ed missed Scottsdale&#8217;s crash data though. Which is buried in the master bike plan.<br />
64 percent of crashes were from sidewalk wrong riders.<br />
only 15 percent were in the roadway riding the right way.<br />
<a href="http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/traffic/alttransmethod/bikeways.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/traffic/alttransmethod/bikeways.asp</a><br />
And if Scottsdale master plan can&#8217;t get any better. The specifically address where the focus of enforcement should be. wrong way riders, failing to yield to pedestrians and I am guessing wrong way sidewalk riding, riding with out lights, and finally at the very very bottom obeying traffic signals. </p>
<p>This is very true I have had many officers observe me safely rolling through stop signs. </p>
<p>also almost 25 percent of our officers are trained to be bicycle cops. </p>
<p>I agree with E. raise that dam driving age and lower the drinking age. Ban cell phone usage period.<br />
Lower the speed limits<br />
Get EDRs into cars now not 2012. Start using the data in crashes which have EDRs in cars.<br />
Start revoking more DLs for longer periods of time. etc etc. This should be a no brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/study-finds-bad-driving-not-bad-cycling-the-cause-of-most-cycling-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-10596</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/?p=1282#comment-10596</guid>
		<description>Tom, it&#039;s logical that both be equally true, if the lower one refers to the more inclusive car/bike &quot;incidents&quot;  and the higher to fatalities only, as this type of incident carries a greater chance of fatality than most.  Therefore even if it doesn&#039;t happen very often (3%), if it does you&#039;re probably going to die, which raises the percentage for that outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, it&#8217;s logical that both be equally true, if the lower one refers to the more inclusive car/bike &#8220;incidents&#8221;  and the higher to fatalities only, as this type of incident carries a greater chance of fatality than most.  Therefore even if it doesn&#8217;t happen very often (3%), if it does you&#8217;re probably going to die, which raises the percentage for that outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/study-finds-bad-driving-not-bad-cycling-the-cause-of-most-cycling-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-10594</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/?p=1282#comment-10594</guid>
		<description>The full 64 page report can be downloaded here, though you have to create a free account with TRL: http://bit.ly/70hy94</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The full 64 page report can be downloaded here, though you have to create a free account with TRL: <a href="http://bit.ly/70hy94" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/70hy94</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Star</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/study-finds-bad-driving-not-bad-cycling-the-cause-of-most-cycling-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-10591</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/?p=1282#comment-10591</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good that TBL put this study out there (and Red Star thanks him). But there are limitations. For one thing, the study was done in the UK (where motorists drive on the wrong side of the road, as Chevy Chase discovered to his frustration in National Lampoon&#039;s &quot;European Vacation&quot;). So there are generalizability (sp?) issues, always a difficulty in epidemiology. What falls out is why isn&#039;t this (or is it?) studied in USA?

Anyway, a different take on things is provided by a relatively obscure Sheldon Brown-like character:

Is Cycling Dangerous?

over at:

http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/health/risks.htm

(it&#039;s not a scholarly/professional/peer-reviewed work, just some things to think about, talking points, from a seasoned cyclist)

Part of the well-meaning adventure over at:

http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/sitemap.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~

Spoiler alert:

Kifer&#039;s thoughts and assertions are a bit dated (circa turn of the century). Here&#039;s why, some sad irony:

http://www.kenkifer.com/death.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that TBL put this study out there (and Red Star thanks him). But there are limitations. For one thing, the study was done in the UK (where motorists drive on the wrong side of the road, as Chevy Chase discovered to his frustration in National Lampoon&#8217;s &#8220;European Vacation&#8221;). So there are generalizability (sp?) issues, always a difficulty in epidemiology. What falls out is why isn&#8217;t this (or is it?) studied in USA?</p>
<p>Anyway, a different take on things is provided by a relatively obscure Sheldon Brown-like character:</p>
<p>Is Cycling Dangerous?</p>
<p>over at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/health/risks.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/health/risks.htm</a></p>
<p>(it&#8217;s not a scholarly/professional/peer-reviewed work, just some things to think about, talking points, from a seasoned cyclist)</p>
<p>Part of the well-meaning adventure over at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/sitemap.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/sitemap.htm</a></p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>Spoiler alert:</p>
<p>Kifer&#8217;s thoughts and assertions are a bit dated (circa turn of the century). Here&#8217;s why, some sad irony:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kenkifer.com/death.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.kenkifer.com/death.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/study-finds-bad-driving-not-bad-cycling-the-cause-of-most-cycling-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-10589</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/?p=1282#comment-10589</guid>
		<description>One of the things we may do in Tempe in 2010 is work with Tempe PD SE (Selective Enforcement) division to have the 3 foot rule enforced on some of our rides.

This new data is interesting as the data in our LAB LCI training materials suggests that only 3% of car/bike incidents are &quot;bicyclist hit from behind by car&quot;. 

In all my talks with uneducated cyclists, the &quot;I&#039;m afraid a car will hit me from behind&quot; is the most cited reason that they choose to ride on the sidewalk, the wrong way, etc. Now it seems their fears are more founded than the older data suggests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things we may do in Tempe in 2010 is work with Tempe PD SE (Selective Enforcement) division to have the 3 foot rule enforced on some of our rides.</p>
<p>This new data is interesting as the data in our LAB LCI training materials suggests that only 3% of car/bike incidents are &#8220;bicyclist hit from behind by car&#8221;. </p>
<p>In all my talks with uneducated cyclists, the &#8220;I&#8217;m afraid a car will hit me from behind&#8221; is the most cited reason that they choose to ride on the sidewalk, the wrong way, etc. Now it seems their fears are more founded than the older data suggests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Swift</title>
		<link>http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/study-finds-bad-driving-not-bad-cycling-the-cause-of-most-cycling-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-10586</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/?p=1282#comment-10586</guid>
		<description>I absolutely love and agree with your call to decrease the minimum drinking age and increase the minimum driving age. But yes, we&#039;re probably both dreaming.
Also, I&#039;m headed to Tucson in the next few days to stay through March. Looking forward to getting a taste of what Arizona has to offer for cycling!
Cheers,
Heidi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely love and agree with your call to decrease the minimum drinking age and increase the minimum driving age. But yes, we&#8217;re probably both dreaming.<br />
Also, I&#8217;m headed to Tucson in the next few days to stay through March. Looking forward to getting a taste of what Arizona has to offer for cycling!<br />
Cheers,<br />
Heidi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

